Law and Ayn Rand: Objectivism from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy

Authors

  • Luca Moratal Roméu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v17i2.101

Abstract

Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand, subordinates legal concepts to radical capitalism as a political ideal. Such concepts, however, play an important role in her political thought. Scrutiny of those writings where Ayn Rand deals with these concepts shows a middle ground between Natural Law, Positivist and Legal Realist perspectives. According to Objectivism, objectivity becomes the essential feature of Law in the stricter sense. In this respect, Rand’s approach moves away from the philosophical influences of Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas, and proclaims the incompatibility of the minimal state with uncertainty and any kind of discretionary powers in the legal field. The contrast with Hayek’s later legal-philosophical contribution points to the feasibility of an integration into what could constitute the basis for a Libertarian legal science.

Keywords: Ayn Rand, Objectivism, political philosophy, philosophy of Law, Law.

JEL Classification: K10, K20, K21, K30.

Resumen: En el objetivismo, la filosofía de Ayn Rand, el tratamiento de los conceptos jurídicos se subordina al capitalismo radical como ideal político. Dichos conceptos, sin embargo, juegan un papel importante en esta teorización. El examen de los textos donde Rand los aborda revela un posicionamiento intermedio entre las perspectivas iusnaturalista, positivista y realista. Lo determinante en la configuración del Derecho, para el objetivismo, será la objetividad de la ley. En la materia, Rand se distancia de Aristóteles y Santo Tomás como únicas influencias filosóficas reconocidas y proclama la incompatibilidad del Estado mínimo con cualquier indeterminación o discrecionalidad en el ámbito de lo legal. El contraste con los sucesivos planteamientos iusfilosóficos de Hayek apunta a la posibilidad de una integración en lo que podría ser el fundamento de una ciencia jurídica libertaria.

Palabras clave: Ayn Rand, objetivismo, filosofía política, filosofía jurídica, Derecho.

Clasificación JEL: K10, K20, K21, K30.

References

Aristóteles:

——Órganon (Trad. y com. García-Baró, M., Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme, 2012).

——Política (Trad. García Gual, C., y Pérez Jiménez, A., Barcelona: Altaya, 1993).

Bacon, F. (1650): Novum organum scientiarum, Leiden: ex off. Adriani Wyngaerden.

Branden, B. (1987): The Passion of Ayn Rand, New York: Anchor Books (Random House).

Hayek, F. (1982): Law, Legislation and Liberty, London: Routledge.

Leoni, B. (1961): Freedom and the Law, Princeton (NJ): Van Nostrand.

Lowi, T. J. (2009): “Collective Shrug (a letter to The New York Times)”, en: The New York Times Sunday Book Review (Nov. 15, 2009), p. 6.Panebianco, A. (2004): Il potere, lo stato, la libertà. La gracile costituzione della società libera. Bologna: Il Mulino.Peikoff, L.:

——(1976): The Philosophy of Objectivism, grabación (tape), Oceanside (CA), Lectures on Objectivism.

——(1993): Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand, New York: Meridian (Penguin Group).

Rand, A.:

——(1957): Atlas Shrugged, New York: Random House.

——(1961): “The Objectivist Ethics”, en: The Virtue of Selfishness, Irvine (CA): Signet (Penguin Group), 1964, pp. 13-39.

——(1962a): “Antitrust: The Rule of Unreason”, en: The Objectivist Newsletter, Vol. 1, Nº 2, Feb. 1962, pp. 5-8.

——(1962b): “Introducing Objectivism”, en: The Ayn Rand Column, Irvine (CA): Ayn Rand Institute Press, 1991, pp. 3-5.

——(1963a): “Man’s Rights”, en: The Virtue of Selfishness, Irvine (CA): Signet (Penguin Group), 1964, pp. 108-117.

——(1963b): “Review of J. H. Randall’s Aristotle”, en: The Objectivist Newsletter, Vol. 2, Nº 5, May 1963, pp. 18-20.

——(1963c): “The Nature of Government”, en: Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, New York: Signet (Penguin Group), 1967, pp. 378-387.

——(1963d): “Vast Quicksands”, en: The Objectivist Newsletter, Vol. 2, Nº 7, July 1963, pp. 25-28.

——(1964): “Government Financing in a Free Society”, en: The Virtue of Selfishness, Irvine (CA): Signet (Penguin Group), 1964, pp. 135-140.

——(1997): Letters of Ayn Rand, New York: Plume (Penguin Group).

Sciabarra, C. M. (1995): Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical, University Park (PE): The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Smith, T. (2016): “Objective Law”, en: VV.AA. (2016): A Companion to Ayn Rand, Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 209-221.

Tomás de Aquino: Summa Theologiae (Textum Leoninum Romae, 1888, disponible en: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth0000.html).

Downloads

Published

2020-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Law and Ayn Rand: Objectivism from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. (2020). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 17(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v17i2.101