Israel Kirzner On Dynamic Efficiency And Economic Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v17i2.106Abstract
Israel Kirzner lays the foundations of entrepreneurship as the driving force of the market process by referring to alertness, uncertainty, and plan coordination. His approach, following the footsteps of Mises and Hayek, legitimizes entrepreneurial creativity and profit-making as the heart of the dynamic market process. He argues that an accurate insight into the economic system requires exploring how entrepreneurial dynamics work in society. This statement contrasts with the theories and models that govern modern development economics, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which the zero-intelligence agents replace the flesh-and-blood entrepreneur.
Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in modern development economics to assess treatment intervention efficacy in underdeveloped countries (Rodrik 2009). As a causal inference method, RCTs seek to determine whether a program had the outcome for which it was designed. Experts often utilize purely quantitative and experimental strategies for their guiding insights through trial and error of different interventions. In the ethics domain, experts seek to maximize the cost-benefit of specific interventions subject to a given set of data to rectify the inequalities generated by the market economy in underdeveloped economies. The economist becomes a kind of plumber who designs the creation and distribution of the “social pie,” assigning the respective slices to the specific individuals who participate in the experiments. Consequently, RCTs have justified active government intervention in the market process on behalf of policy advisers.
However, Kirzner’s theory of entrepreneurship indicates that modern development economics’s core problem is epistemological and related to using the criterion of static efficiency in applied economics. Although RCTs are considered one of the most rigorous methods to inquire into the effectiveness of development policies, their design lacks interpretative capacity on the essence of economic phenomena. Experts on RCTs do not recognize that economic development is the byproduct of achieving social cooperation and coordination driven by purposeful human action under the division of labor. If the essence of economic phenomena is disregarded, it is impossible to address poverty causes adequately. Accordingly, RCTs are limited to testing cosmetic problems of economic underdevelopment.
This article does not seek to offer specific proposals to remedy RCTs’ shortcomings, but it provides a theoretical foundation to guide further theoretical and empirical work. It argues that development economists have overlooked Kirzner’s theory of efficiency, which cannot be omitted without impairing the premise that development theory involves studying the dynamic process of plan coordination. Its relevance lies in the fact that Kirzner’s research can reshape modern development economics, which implies a theoretical advancement in several areas:
• Kirzner’s analysis of static efficiency reveals the epistemological and ethical problems of modern development economics.
• The framework of Kirzner’s dynamic efficiency clarifies the role of entrepreneurship in understanding how the market works.
• Dynamic efficiency recognizes the creative and coordinating potential of entrepreneurship and capital accumulation in economic development.
• Kirzner’s economic development theory responds to ethical dilemmas about (in)equality and pure profit within a market economy.
• Contemporary research on dynamic efficiency explores new branches, such as the role of psychology, culture, and morality in economic development.
Most research on efficiency and underdevelopment is still packaged in mathematical models that reduce the market’s complexity to comparative statics. Fortunately, a growing number of theories have begun to challenge this state of affairs by examining the following: First, psychology’s impact on productivity or the unproductiveness of entrepreneurial profit opportunities. Second, the role of culture in the dynamic process of institutional change and the adaptation of the entrepreneurial performance that ensures or deter economic development. Third, the relationship between personal morality and dynamic efficiency concerns private property and contractual ties. Hence, there are several strands of new literature on dynamic efficiency and development economics. This article focuses on one aspect that concerns both economists and governments in terms of modern thinking and practice: the role of efficiency (static and dynamic) in economic development.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). “Unbundling Institutions.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 113, No. 5, pp. 949-995.
Banerjee, A. V. (2005). “New Development Economics’ and the Challenge to Theory.” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 40, No. 40, pp. 4340-4344.
Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty, New York, Public Affairs.
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). “The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation.”American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 22-53.
Banerjee, A., Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., Mukerji, S., Shotland, M., & Walton, M. (2017). “From Proof of Concept to Scalable Policies: Challenges and Solutions, with an Application.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 73-102.
Bauer, P. T., & Yamey, B. S. (1957). Economics of Under-developed Countries, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive.” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 3-22.
Beinhocker, E., & Hanauer, N. (2014). “Redefining Capitalism.” McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 160-169.
Boettke, P. J. (2018). “Economics and Public Administration.” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 938–959.
Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2008). “Institutional Stickiness and the New Development Economics.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 331-358.
Böhm-Bawerk, E. V. 1959. Capital and Interest, Vol. 2, Positive Theory of Capital, South Holland, The Libertarian Press.
Bouguen, A., Huang, Y., Kremer, M., & Miguel, E. (2019). “Using Randomized Controlled Trials to Estimate Long-Run Impacts in Development Economics.” Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 523-561.
Coyne, C., Sobel, R., & Dove, J. (2010). “The Non-productive Entrepreneurial Process.” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 333-346.
Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). “Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Trials.” Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 210, pp. 2-21.
Demsetz, H. (1969). “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-22.
Duflo, E. (2017). Richard T. “Ely Lecture: The Economist as Plumber.” American Economic Review, Vol. 107, No. 5, pp. 1-26.
Easterly, W. R. (2007). The White Man’s Burden, New York, The Penguin Press.
——(2014). The Tyranny of Experts, New York, Basic Books. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical Psychics, London, Kegan Paul & Co.
Espinosa, V. I. (2020). “Epistemological Problems of Development Economics.” Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política 17(1): 55-93.
Fisher, I. (1906). The Nature of Capital and Income, New York, The Macmillan Press.
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2010). “Alertness, Action, and the Antecedents of Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Private Enterprise, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 145-164.
Harper, D. A. (2003). Foundations of Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, London and New York, Routledge.
——(2013). “Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Coordination.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, No. 88, pp. 62-77.
Hayek, F. A. (1937). “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica, Vol. 4, No. 13, pp. 33-54.
——(1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 519-530.
——(1952). The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, Illinois, The Free Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Huerta de Soto, J. (2009). The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency, London and New York, Routledge.
——(2010). Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham and Northhampton, Edward Elgar.
——(2011). “The Essence of the Austrian School and the Concept of Dynamic Efficiency.” Review of Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 15-32.
Jevons, W. S. (1888). The Theory of Political Economy, London, The Macmillan Press.
Jones, C. I. (2015). “Pareto and Piketty: The Macroeconomics of Top Income and Wealth Inequality.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 29-46.
Keynes, J. M. (1926). “The End of Laissez-Faire.” In John M. Keynes, ed. Essays in Persuasion, London, W. W. Norton & Company.
——[1936] (2012). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Kirzner, I. M. (1960). The Economic Point of View, Kansas City, Sheed & Ward.
——(1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
——(1979). Perception, Opportunity and Profit, Studies in the Theory of Entrepreneurship, Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press.
——(1985). Discovery and the Capitalist Process, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
——(1996). Essays on Capital and Interest: An Austrian Perspective, Northampton and Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
——(2000). “The Ethics of Competition.” In I. Kirzner, ed. The Driving Force of the Market: Essays in Austrian Economics, London and New York, Routledge.
——(2009). “The Alert and Creative Entrepreneur: A Clarification.” Small Business Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 145-152.
——(2017). “The Entrepreneurial Market Process.” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 855–868.
Marshall, A. [1890] (2013). Principles of Economics, New York, The Macmillan Press.
Mayer, H. (1994). “The Cognitive Value of Functional Theories of Price.” In I. Kirzner, ed. Classics in Austrian Economics, Vol. II, London, William Pickering.
Miller, T., Kim, A., Roberts, J., & Tyrrell, P. (2020). Index of Economic Freedom, Washington, D.C., The Heritage Foundation.
Merriam-Webster. (2020). “Dictionary.” In Merriam-Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/shop-dictionaries/dictionaries/collegiate-dictionary-eleventh-edition
Mirowski, P. E. (1989). More Heat than Light, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
——(1991). “The When, the How and the Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 145–157.
Mises, L. E. [1920] (1935). “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth.” In F. A. Hayek, ed. Collectivist Economic Planning, Clifton, Augustus M. Kelley.
——[1949] (1966). Human Action: A treatise in Economics, Chicago, Henry Regnery. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pareto, V. [1906] (2014). Manual of Political Economy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Parker, S. C. (2018). “Entrepreneurship and Economic Theory.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 540-564.
Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and Ideology, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Robbins, L. C. (1935) [1932]. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London, MacMillan.
Rodrik, D. (2009). “The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn?.” In J. Cohen & W. Easterly, eds. What Works in Development? Thinking Big and Thinking Small, Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press.
Rothbard, M. N. [1962] (2009). Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic Principles, Auburn, The Mises Institute Press.
——(1985). “Professor Hébert on entrepreneurship.” Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 281-286.
Royal Spanish Academy. (2020). “Dictionary.” In The Royal Spanish Academy. https://dle.rae.es/
Sachs, J. D. (2005). The End of Poverty: How We can Make it Happen in our Lifetime, London, The Penguin Press.
Salerno, J. T. (2008). “The Entrepreneur: Real and Imagined.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 11, No. 3-4, pp. 188-207.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1965). “Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History.” In H. G. Aitken, ed. Explorations in Enterprise, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 217-226.
Sweezy, P. M. (1947). “Keynes the Economist.” In S.E. Harris, ed. The New Economics: Keynes’ Influence on Theory and Public Policy, London, Dennis Dobson.
Toye, J. (2018). “The Counterrevolution in Development Economics.” In M. Alacevich and M. Boianovsky, eds. The Political Economy of Development Economics: A Historical Perspective, Durham y London, Duke University Press.
UNDP. (2019). Human Development Report 2019, New York, United Nations Development Programme.
Walras, L. [1874] (2014). Elements of Pure Economics or The Theory of Social Wealth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
