Economic Effects Of The Philosophical Concept Of Community

Authors

  • Alfonso Díaz Vera

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v17i2.108

Abstract

Introductory textbooks in the History of Economic Thought in use at colleges and universities devote little space to Scholasticism and its influence. Even those that do not start straight with the Physiocrats, Thomas Aquinas appears stuck between Ancient Greek Philosophers and Thomas Mun. Scholasticism with “medieval” economic thought characterized as primitive and focused on “obsolete” issues like usury and just price. Sometimes it is even categorized among the schools that promote State intervention1.

This was not the opinion of F.A. Hayek, who appreciated some Scholastic authors as part of the individualistic tradition of Western civilization rooted on the legacy of Ancient Greeks and Romans like Pericles, Thucydides, Cicero and Tacitus2.

In his famous Road to Serfdom (1944) F.A. Hayek assumed that Western Civilization had abandoned the right road and the individualistic tradition by the last quarter of the XIX Century. The abandoned road that Hayek refers to is that grounded on Greek, Roman and Medieval tradition and later paved by the ideas of authors like Cobden, Bright, De Tocqueville, Lord Acton, Adam Smith, Hume, Locke or Milton3.

Hilaire Belloc4 located the abandonment of the liberal tradition around the same historical time. He would have agreed with most of the names in Hayek´s list, especially Cobden and Bright, but would have added those of radicals like Fox and Cobbett. Regarding more far away sources of Western thought, he would have included Aristotle, Aquinas and the Spanish Jesuit Francisco Suárez.
Some of the authors mentioned above represent different traditions in the political philosophy. These traditions could be referred as the “old” and the “new”, following Leo Strauss in the idea of Machiavelli as the turning point. This essay approaches the influence of the political philosophy in the changes referred by Hayek and Belloc by examining the differences between the old and the new concept of community.

References

Belloc, H. (1897): “The Liberal Tradition”, Essays in liberalism by six Oxford men, London. Cassell & Company.

—— (1930): Europe and the Faith, New York, The Paulist Press.

—— (1954): How the Reformation Happened, London, Jonathan Cape.

—— (2007): The Servile State, New York, Cosimo Classics.

Blaug, M. (1983): The Methodology of Economics or how Economists Explain, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Cendejas Bueno, J. L. (2017): “Economics, chrematistics, oikos and polis in Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas”, The Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, X n. 2, pp. 5-46.

Gómez Rivas, L. (2014): Historia del Pensamiento Económico, Ávila, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Católica de Ávila.

Grice-Hutchinson, M. (1952): The School of Salamanca. Readings in Spanish Monetary Theory, 1544-1605, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Hayek, F.A. (1958): Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

——(1992): The fatal conceit: the errors of socialism, London, Routledge.

——(2006): The Road to Serfdom, New York, Routledge Classics.

——(2013): Law, Legislation and Liberty, London, Routledge.

Hobbes, TH. (1965): Leviathan, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Huerta de Soto, J. (2017): “Anarquía, Dios y el Papa Francisco”, Procesos de Mercado: Revista europea de economía política, XIV n. 2, pp. 205-218.

Liebersohn, H. (1988): “The Utopian Forms of Religious Life. Ernst Troeltsch’s ‘The Social Teachings of the Christian Church’”, Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, n°65/1, pp. 121-143.

López Atanes, F.J.; Bustos, I.; & Villena, P.M. (2010): Suárez, una aproximación al tratado de las leyes y la defensa de la fe, Madrid, Unión Editorial.

Mccarthy, J. (1978): Hilaire Belloc: Edwardian Radical, Indianapolis, Liberty Press.

Medema, S.G. & Warren, J.S. eds. (2013): The History of Economic Thought: A Reader, 2nd edition, New York, Routledge.

Negro Pavón, D. (2008): La situación de las sociedades europeas, Madrid, Unión Editorial.

Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace (2005): Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, City of the Vatican, Editrice Vaticana Library.

Prieto López, L. (2018): Francisco Suárez, Tratado de la obra de los seis días (forthcoming).

Rothbard, M.N. (2006): Economic Thought before Adam Smith, Auburn, Ludwig Von Mises Institute.

Strauss, L. (1987): Niccolo Machiavelli. STRAUSS, L. & CROPSEY, J. eds.: History of Political Philosophy, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Troeltsch, E. (1992): The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, vols. 1 & 2, Louisville (KY), Westminster John Knox Press.

Voegelin, E. (1987): The New Science of Politics: An Introduction, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Weber, M. (1992): The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London, Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-01

Issue

Section

Notes

How to Cite

Economic Effects Of The Philosophical Concept Of Community. (2020). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 17(2), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v17i2.108