A libertarian case for monarchy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v11i2.169Abstract
Clear thought and discussion suffer when all sorts of good things, like liberty, equality, fraternity, rights, majority rule, and general welfare – some in tension with others – are marketed together under the portmanteau label «democracy.»
Democracy’s core meaning is a particular method of choosing, replacing, and influencing government officials (Schumpeter 1950). It is not a doctrine of what government should and should not do. Nor is it the same thing as personal freedom or a free society or an egalitarian social ethos. True enough, some classical liberals, like Thomas Paine (1791) and Ludwig von Mises (1919), did scorn hereditary monarchy and did express touching faith that representative democracy would choose excellent leaders and adopt policies truly serving the common interest. Experience has taught us better, as the American founders already knew when constructing a government of separated and limited powers and of only filtered democracy.
As an exercise, and without claiming that my arguments are decisive, I’ll contend that constitutional monarchy can better preserve people’s freedom and opportunities than democracy as it has turned out in practice.1
References
BAGEHOT, W. (1966): The English Constitution. 1867, 1872. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Paperbacks.
BARRY, N. (2003): «What’s So Good About Democracy?» Ideas on Liberty 53 (May): pp. 448.
CAMPBELL, C.M. (1999): «Large Electorates and Decisive Minorities.» Journal of Political Economy 107 (December): pp. 1199-1217.
CONSTANT, B. (1988): Political Writings. 1814-1815. Translated and edited by Biancamaria Fontana. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.
GABB, S.(2002): «In Defence of the Monarchy.» Free Life Commen-tary, n.º 83 (9 December).
GRAY, J. (1993): Post-Liberalism: Studies in Political Thought. London and New York: Routledge.
HABSBURG, O. VON (1970): «Monarchy or Republic.» 1958. In The Conservative Tradition in European Thought, edited by Robert Schuettinger, pp. 258-67. New York: Putnam.
HAYEK, F.A. (1979): The Political Order of a Free People, vol. 3 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
HOPPE, H.-H. (2001): Democracy: The God That Failed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
INTERNATIONAL MONARCHIST LEAGUE: «The Case for Monarchy.»
JENKIN, T.P. (1968): «Oligarchy.» In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by David L. Sills, vol. 11: pp. 281-283. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.
KUEHNELT-LEDDIHN, E. VON (1952): Liberty or Equality. Edited by John P. Hughes. London: Hollis & Carter.
LEWIS, B., and WOOLSEY, R.J. (2003): «King and Country.» Wall Street Journal, 29 October.
MENCKEN, H.L. (1926): Notes on Democracy. New York: Knopf.
MISES, L. VON (1983): Nation, State, and Economy. 1919. New York: New York University Press.
PAINE, T. (1973, 1989): The Rights of Man. Part First, 1791, and Part Second, 1792. In Two Classics of the French Revolution: Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France and Paine’s The Rights of Man, pp. 267-515. New York: Doubleday, Anchor Books.
PROWSE, M. (2001): «Why Britain Should Hold «Royal Referen-dums».» Financial Times, 21-2. April.
PURCELL, F. (2003): «All Hail the House of Habsburg!» 18 August.
SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1962): Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 1950. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
SOWELL, T. (1994): Quoted (without indication of source) in «End notes.» CEI UpDate 7 (July): p. 8. «Thesen pro Monarchie. ( http://rasputin.de/Monarch/thesen.html ).
TULLOCK, G. (1987): Autocracy. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.
