Structured, Transitional and Unstructured Civil Societies: An Institutional Approach

Authors

  • Rubén Méndez Reategui Miembro del staff académico del Departamento de Eco-nomía de la Universidad de Macquarie.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v11i2.172

Abstract

This paper seeks to introduce an alternative conceptual taxonomy of civil society as an input to Austrian law and economics and neo-institutional economics. The conceptual framework of the paper develops three categories: unstructured, transitional, and structured civil societies. This categorization was, in part, inspired by Parsons’ (1966, p. 33) contribution to functional sociology: «Society is an intelligent structure, rationally structured to integrate its com-plex parts into a coherent whole (...) A social system consists of a plurality of social agents interacting with each other in a situation which has at least a physical or environmental aspect, agents moti-vated by a tendency towards the “optimization of satisfaction” whose interactions with their own circumstances, are defined and influenced by a culturally shared system of structured symbols.»

However, our proposal does not focus on the associative system as a «set» of aggregates (Parsons, 1968).1 In contrast, following a previous academic paper (Mendez, 2013), the individuality of the agents is assumed. This differs from Parsons’ approach (1978), where agents become secondary receivers in the process of so-cialization. In addition, it has been assumed in this paper that the permanent display of individualism (economic subjectivism) in civil society occurs through the interaction of associative agents (Garcia-Guadilla et al., 1997). These individuals acting as «creative or entrepreneurial agents» (Kirzner, 1978a) help to maintain asso-ciative cohesion through productive entrepreneurship (Baumol, 1990).

References

ALONSO, J.A. (2012): «Crítica de Libro: Why Nations Fail. The origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty» (by Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A.), Principios. Estudios de Economía Política, n.º 21, Madrid: Fundación Sistema.

ALONSO, J.A. and GARCIMARTIN, C. (2008): Collective Action and Development. The Role of Institutions, Madrid: Editorial Com-plutense.

ALFONSO, J. (1999): «Desarrollo económico: marco evolutivo e ins-titucional», Ekonomiaz, vol. 43, pp. 232-250.

ARGOÑA, A. (1991): «Values, Institutions and ethics», Working Paper, n.º 215, IESE Business School - University of Navarra Press.

ACEMOGLU, D. and JOHNSON, S. (2005): «Unbundling Institutions», Journal of Political Economy, vol. 113, n.º 5, pp. 949-995.

ACEMOGLU, D. and ROBINSON, J.A. (2012): «Why Nations Fail», NY: Crown Publishers.

ALI, A. (2003): «Institutional Differences as Sources of Growth Differences», Atlantic Economic Journal, vol. 31, n.º 4, pp. 348-362. AOKI, M. (2001): Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis, Cambridge - Mass: MIT Press.

— (2007): «Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes», Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 1-31.

AXALA, G. & FABRO, J. (2008): «¿El impacto de la calidad institucio-nal sobre el crecimiento económico depende del nivel inicial de renta?», Economic Affairs, n.º 28, vol. 3, pp. 45-49.

BARRY, N. (1982 [1997]): «The tradition of Spontaneous Order», Laissez-Faire, n.º 6, pp. 1-43, UFM Press.

BASSANINI, A., SCARPETTA, S. and HEMMINGS, P. (2001): Economic growth: the role of policies and institutions. OECD Press.

BAUMOL, W. (1968): «Entrepreneurship in Economic Theory», American Economic Review, n.º 58, vol. 2, pp. 64-7.

BAUMOL, W.J. (1990): «Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproduc-tive, and Destructive», The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, n.º 5, pp. 893-921.

BECKER, G. (1983): «Una teoría de la Competencia entre grupos de presión por influencia política», Cuadernos Trimestrales de Eco-nomía, n.º 98, pp. 371-373.

BENEGAS-LYNCH, A. (2005): «El Conocimiento y la Ciencia: Algunas Consideraciones Hayekianas». Revista de Economía y Derecho, vol. 2, n.º 5, pp.13-26.

BLUNDELL, J. and ROBINSON, C. (2000): «La regulación sin el Estado», Revista Libertas, n.º 32, pp. 4-22.

BOETTKE, P.J. (2001): Calculation and Coordination Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political. London: Routledge.

— (2012): Living Economics. Yesterday, today and tomorrow, Ca-lifornia: The Independent Institute.

BOETTKE, P.J. and COYNE, C.J. (2003): «Entrepreneurship and Development: Cause or consequence?», in Roger Koppl, Jack Birner, and Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard (ed.) Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial Studies (Advances in Austrian Economics, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 67-87.

BOLDEMAN, L. (2007): The cult of the market: economic fundamentalism and its discontents. Canberra: The Australian National Univer-sity Press.

BORON, A. (2003): «Estado, Capitalismo y Democracia en América Latina». Colección Secretaria Ejecutiva CLACSO. Buenos Aires: Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (Clacso).

BRENNAN, G. and BUCHANAN, J. (1984): «Voter Choice: Evaluating Political Alternatives», American Behavioural Scientist, n.º 29, pp. 185-201.

— (1987): La razón de las normas. Economía Política Constitucional, Madrid: Unión Editorial.

BUCHANAN, J. and TULLOCK, G. (1962): The Calculus of the Consense: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Madrid: Planeta Press.

BYRNES, J., DOLLERY, B. and WALLIS, J. (2001): Local Government Failure in Australia: An Empirical Analysis of New South Wa-les, NSW: University of New England School of Economics Publisher.

CABALLERO, G. (2001): «La Nueva Economía Institucional», Sistema Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Vigo, n.º 161, pp. 59-86.

CABALLERO, G. and KINGSTON, C. (2005): «Cambio cultural, dinámi-ca institucional y ciencia cognitiva: hacia una comprensión multidisciplinaria del desarrollo económico», Revista de Eco-nomía Institucional, n.º 13, vol. 13, pp. 100-121.

CÁCERES, R. (2005): Institutions, Law and Cost of Transaction. Lima: Pacific University Press.

CALABRESI, G. and MELAMED, A.D. (1972): «Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral», Harvard Law Review, vol. 85, p. 108.

CAVADIAS, E. (2001): «El nuevo Institucionalismo en América Latina», Ciencias de Gobierno, n.º 10, pp. 11-25.

CHANG, H. (2011): «Institutions and economic development: theory, policy and history», Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 7, n.º 4, pp. 473-498, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CLEMENS, E. and COOK, J. (1999): «Politics and institutionalism: explaining durability and change», Annual Review of Sociology, n.º 25, pp. 441-66.

COASE, R.H. (1994): La empresa, el mercado y la ley. Madrid: Alianza Economía.

COBIN, J.M. (2009): Políticas públicas: tópicos modernos de la economía de mercado para el bienestar social, Santiago de Chile: Fondo Edi-torial Universidad Andrés Bello.

COLLINS, H. (1985): «Political Ideology in Australia: The Distinc-tiveness of a Benthamite Society», Daedalus, n.º 1, vol. 114, pp. 147-169.

CONGRESS OF PERU (2014): «Peruvian Political Constitutions», available at http://www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/constituciones.html.

CORDOVA, D. (2004): «La nueva economía institucional y el análisis del subdesarrollo en América Latina», Revista de Economía & Derecho, n.º 4, pp. 7-24.

DE SOTO, H., GHERSI, E. and GHIBELLINI, M. (1987): El otro sendero: La revolución informal, Lima: Instituto Libertad y Democracia.

DOMJAHN, T. (2011): «Informal institutions and economic develop-ment», Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, vol. 5, issue 2.

DREYER L., D. and BIE, L.H. (2008): «Informal Institutions and Intergenerational Contracts: Evidence from Schooling and Remittances in Rural Tanzania», Working Paper, n.º 3, Centre for Applied Microeconometrics, Copenhagen: Department of Economics University of Copenhagen.

EGGERTSSON, T. (1990): Economic Behaviour and Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ESPOSTO, A. and TOHME, F. (2009): Drifting Apart: The Divergent Development Paths of Argentina and Australia, VDM Verlag Publishers.

EVANS, P. y RAUCH, R. (1999). «Bureaucracy and growth: a cross-national analysis of the effect of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth», American Sociological Review, n.º 64, pp. 748-65.

FOSS, N.J. and KLEIN, P.G. (2010): «Alertness, Action, and the Antecedents of Entrepreneurship», The Journal of Private Enter-prise, vol. 2, pp. 145-164.

FURUBOTB, E.G. and RICHTER, R. (1998): Institutions and Economic Theo-ry, The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

GAGLIARDI, F. (2008): «Institutions and Economic Change: A Critical Survey of the New Institutional Approaches and Empirical Evidence», Journal of Socio-Economics, vol. 37, n.º 1, pp. 416-443.

GARCIA-GUADILLA, M. and ROA CARRERO, P. (1997). «Civil Society, Classic Liberal Democracy and Market Economics: The Liberal Organizations in Venezuela», Estudios Científicos, Salamanca: Ediciones USAL.

GERBER, E.R. (1999): The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation, Princeton: Princeton Uni-versity Press.

GHERSI, S.E. (1988). «El Costo de la Legalidad», Centro de Estudios Públicos, n.º 30, pp. 83-110.

— (1991): «Economía de la corrupción», Centro de Estudios Públicos, n.º 73, pp. 3-20.

— (2005): «La economía informal en América Latina», Cato Journal, vol. 7, n.º 1, pp. 1-14.

— (2007): «The competitive character of the Sources of Law», Revista de Instituciones, Ideas y Mercados, n.º 47, pp. 89-109.

— (2009): «Las consecuencias jurídicas del mercantilismo», EL CATO, Washington: Cato Institute.

GERBER, E.R. (1999): The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation, Princeton: Princeton Uni-versity Press.

GREIF, A. (1998): «Historical and Comparative Institutional Analy-sis», The American Economic Review, n.º 88, vol. 2, pp. 80-84.

GREIF, A. and LAITIN, D.D. (2004): «A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change», American Political Science Review, n.º 98, pp. 613-32.

HART, H.L.A. (1980): El concepto de Derecho, México: Editorial Na-cional.

HAYEK, F.A. (1948): Individualism and Economic Order, University of Chicago Press.

— (1964): The Counter- Revolution of Science: Studies on the abuse of reason, The Free Press of Glencoe Collier-Macmillan Limited, London.

— (1978): Law, Legislation and Liberty, University of Chicago Press.

HELLMAN, J. and KAUFMANN, D. (2001): «La captura del Estado en las economías en transición», Finanzas y Desarrollo, n.º 38, vol. 3, pp. 31-35.

HELMKE, G. and LEVITSKY, S. (2004): «Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda», Perspectives on Poli-tics, vol. 2, n.º 4.

HEYNE, P.T, PRYCHITKO, D.L. and BOETTKE, P.J. (2009): The Economic Way of Thinking, Prentice Hall.

HIRSHMAN, A.O. (1986): Interés privado y acción pública, F.C.E. Mé-xico.

HODGSON, G.M. (1993): Economía y evolución: Revitalizando la Economía. Madrid: Colegio de Economistas de Madrid, Celeste Ediciones.

— (1998): «The Approach of Institutional Economics». Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36, pp. 166-192.

— (2001): How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London: Routledge.

— (2006): What are institutions?, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 40, n.º 1.

HUERTA DE SOTO, J. (2010): Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

KASPER, W. (2003): Building Prosperity: Australia’s future as a global player, Sydney: The Centre for Independent Studies.

KELSEN, H. (2001): Introducción a la Teoría Pura del Derecho. Lima: Asociación Peruana de Derecho Constitucional.

KIRZNER, I.M. (1976): «Equilibrium versus Market Process», The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Kansas City: Sheed and Ward Inc.

— (1978a): Competition and Entrepreneurship, University of Chicago Press.

— (1978b): Economics and Error, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.

KLEIN, P.G., MAHONEY, J.T., MCGAHAN, A. and PITELIS, C. (2010): «Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship», European Manage-ment Review, n.° 07, pp. 1-15. Milano: European Academy of Management.

KRAUSE, M. (2007): Calidad de las instituciones y competencia institucional, Londres: International Policy Network.

KRAUSE, M., BARBEITO, A. & RESICO, M. (2006): «¿Qué instituciones se necesitan para un crecimiento equitativo y sustentable?», Revista Valores, n.º 67, pp. 20-32.

KRECKE, E. (1998): «El Derecho y el orden del mercado: una crítica austriaca al análisis económico del Derecho», Thémis Nueva Época, n.º 38, pp. 244-264.

KUCZYNSKI, P.P. and WILLIAMSON, J. (2003): After the Washington Consensus: stimulating growth and reforms in Latin America, Institute for International Economics. Lima: UPC Publisher.

KUHN, T.S. (1971): La estructura de las revoluciones científicas, México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

LEVITSKY, S. and MURILLO, M.V. (2010): «Variacion en la fortaleza institucional», Revista de Sociologia, n.º 24, pp. 31-56.

MÉNDEZ REATEGUI, R.C.B. (2011): «Institutional Innovation, Deregulation and Competition in a Structured Society», HDR Expo 2011, Sydney: Macquarie University Faculty of Business and Economics Press.

— (2013a): «Entrepreneurship, Institutions in a Changing Envi-ronment», URJC and IJM - VI Austrian Economics Conference. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Mariana.

— (2013b). «An Introduction to Institutional Coordination», (Wor-king Paper) GLEA Conference, Free University of Bolzano.

— (2013c): «An Introduction to Institutional Coordination as An Alternate Model for Neo-Institutional Economic Analysis», Procesos de Mercado, Revista Europea de Economía Política, vol. 10, n.º 2, pp. 151-200.

MENGER, C. (1976 [1871]): Principles of Economics, Institute for Humane Studies.

MOLTENI, G. (2006): «Principales aportes de la Nueva Economía Institucional (NEI) y sus críticos», Revista Valores, n.º 67, pp. 8-19.

MORCILLO, J. (2011): Una crisis marcada por la globalización: Interven-ción, desregulación y autorregulación regulada, AEDPA: Univer-sidad Castilla-La Mancha.

MUELLER, D.C. (1983): The Political Economy of Growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

— (1986): «Rational Egoism Versus Adaptive Egoism as Fundamen-tal Postulate for a Descriptive Theory of Human Behaviour», Public Choice, n.º 51, pp. 3-23.

— (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

— (1991): «Institutions», Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, n.º 1, pp. 97-112.

— (1994). «Economic Performance Through Time», American Eco-nomic Review, vol. 84, n.º 3, pp. 359-368.

— (2005): Understanding the Process of Economic Change, New York: Princeton University Press.

OSTROM, E. (1990): Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Insti-tutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge Universi-ty Press.

OECD (2005): OECD Guiding Principles for Regulatory Quality and Performance, available at http://www.oecd.org/fr/reformereg/34976533.pdf.

PARK, S.M. (2012). Empirical analysis of Informal Institutions, Thesis Dissertation 1180, Marburg: Philipps-Universität Marburg.

PARSONS, T. (1966): «El sistema social». Revista de Occidente, Buenos Aires: Paidós.

— (1967): Ensayos de Teoría Sociológica, Buenos Aires: Paidós.

— (1968 [1937]): La estructura de la acción social: estudio de teoría so-cial con referencia a un grupo de recientes escritores europeos, Bar-celona: Ediciones Guadarrama.

— (1974): La sociedad: Perspectivas evolutivas y comparativas, México: Trillas.

— (1978): El sistema de las sociedades modernas, México: Trillas

PIERSON, P. (2000): «The limits of institutional design: explaining institutional origins and change», Governance, vol. 4, n.º 13, pp. 475-99.

PÉREZ, E. (2001): Transitions (Theories of): changes in the Eastern countries, Madrid: Editora Crítica de Ciencias Sociales.

QUIAN, Y. (2003): «How reform worked in China», In Search of prosperity», D. Rodrik (Ed.) Analytic narratives on economic growth, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

SAN EMETERIO, N. (2006): New Institutional Economics, Madrid: Sín-tesis Press.

SCHOTTER, A. (1981): The Economic Theory of Social Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SOBEL, R.S. (2008): «Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship», Journal of Business Venturing 23, pp. 641-655.

STIGLER, G. (1982): The Economist as Preacher, and Other Essays, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

— (1992): «Law or Economics?», Journal of Law and Economics, n.º 35, pp. 455-68.

SHAW, A.G.L. (1983): The Story of Australia, London: Farber and Farber.

SPANISH CONGRESS OF DEPUTIES (2014): «Spanish Constitutions 1812-1978», available at http://www.congreso.es/portal/page/portal/Congreso/Congreso/Hist_Normas/ConstEsp1812_1978.

VOIGT, S. (2009): «How to Measure the Rule of Law», available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1420287 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1420287

WEBER, M. (1930): The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, London: Allen & Unwin.

— (1964): Economía y Sociedad, vol. 1, p. 632, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

WILLIAMSON, C. (2009): «Informal institutions rule: institutional arrangements and economic performance», Public Choice, n.º 139, pp. 371-387.

WILLIAMSON, O. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press.

WORLD BANK (2014): Worldwide Governance Indicators, available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#faq

Downloads

Published

2014-07-01

Issue

Section

Notes

How to Cite

Structured, Transitional and Unstructured Civil Societies: An Institutional Approach. (2014). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 11(2), 299-327. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v11i2.172