Bruno Leoni and the socialist economic calculation debate

Authors

  • Carmelo Ferlito PhD in Economics. A-21-07 Casa Tiara Serviced Apartments, Persiaran Kemajuan Subang, SS16/1, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v10i1.202

Abstract

The Italian contribution to the Socialist Economic Calculation Debate (SECD) cannot be limited to the important and fundamental works by Pareto and Barone. In fact, if their contributions are still ambiguous and we have to wait for the Mises’ paper in 1920 in order to get the needed clarifications, during the 1960s Bruno Leoni follows the Austrian footsteps on the topic, stimulating in Italy a great debate. Bruno Leoni’s role is important because of the debate he promotes and the scholars he involves, but also because he places the matter of the socialist economic calculation in the broader context of the rule of law.

Key words: Bruno Leoni, Socialist Economic Calculation Debate, Austrian Economics.

JEL Classification: B25, P21, P22.

Resumen: La contribución italiana al debate sobre el cálculo económico socialista (SECD) no puede limitarse a las aportaciones importantes y funda-mentales de Pareto y Barone. De hecho, si sus contribuciones son todavía ambiguas y tenemos que esperar al trabajo de Mises de 1920 para obtener las aclaraciones necesarias, durante la década de los sesenta Bruno Leoni siguió los pasos de los austriacos en lo referente a este tema, estimulando en Italia un gran debate. El papel de Bruno Leoni es importante debido al debate que promueve y a los académicos que implica, pero también porque sitúa la cuestión del cálculo económico socialista en el contexto más amplio del Estado de Derecho.

Palabras clave: Bruno Leoni, debate sobre el cálculo económico socialista, Economía Austriaca.

Clasificación JEL: B25, P21, P22.

References

BARONE, E. (1935): «The Ministry of Production in the Collectivist State». In F.A. von Hayek, ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, pp. 245-290.

BELLANCA, N., and GIOCOLI, N. (1998): Maffeo Pantaleoni. Il principe degli economisti italiani. Polistampa: Firenze.

BOETTKE, P.J. (2001): «Economic Calculation: The Austrian Con-tribution to Political Economy». In P.J. Boettke, Calculation and Coordination. Essays on socialism and transitional political economy. Routledge: London and New York, pp. 29-46.

FAUCCI, R. (1990): «Materiali e ipotesi sulla cultura economica italiana fra le due guerre mondiali». In G. Becattini, ed., Il pensiero economico: temi, problemi e scuole. Utet: Torino, pp. 183-231.

FERLITO, C. (2009): «Appendice bibliografica». In A. Ebenstein, Friedrich von Hayek. Una biografia. Rubbettino: Soveria Mannelli, pp. 609-647.

—(2010a): «Crisi economica e andamento ciclico». In C. Fer-lito, Contro la crisi. Combattere la crisi, difendere il mercato. Solfanelli: Chieti, pp. 21-51.

—(2010b): «Sproporzionalità e ciclo economico da Tugan-Bara-novskij a Spiethoff». In C. Ferlito, Contro la crisi. Combattere la crisi, difendere il mercato. Solfanelli: Chieti, pp. 91-118.

—(2011a): «Sylos Labini’s Unpublished Notes on Schum-peter’s Business Cycles». The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. Vol. 14, N.º 1: pp. 88-129.

—(2011b): «Il pensiero economico del giovane Guido Mene-gazzi». Studi Storici Luigi Simeoni. Vol. LXI: pp. 133-146.

—(2012): «Garrison’s Capital-Based Macroeconomics: the Role of Deficit, Credit Control and Taxation». In C. Spiller and M.-A. Galindo Martin, eds., Public Finance: Lessons from the Past and Effects on Future. Nova Science Publishers: New York, pp. 105-122.

HAGEMANN, H. and RÖSCH, M. (2001): «The reception of Italian economic thought in Germany and Austria from 1900 to Second World War». In P.F. Asso, ed., From Economists to Eco-nomists. The International Spread of Italian Economic Thought, 1750-1950. Polistampa: Firenze, pp. 177-207.

HAYEK, F.A. VON (1932): «Money and Capital: A Reply». Economic Journal. Vol. 42: pp. 237-249.

—(1935a): «The Nature and the History of the Problem». In F.A. von Hayek, ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, pp. 1-40.

—(1935b): «The Present State of the Debate». In F.A. von Ha-yek, ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. Routledge & Kegan Paul: Lon-don, pp. 201-243.

—(1935c), ed.: Collectivist Economic Planning. Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.

—(1940), «Socialist Calculation: The Competitive “Solution”». Economica. Vol. VII: pp. 125-149.

—(1950): «Full Employment, Planning and Inflation». Institute of Public Affairs Review. Vol. IV, N.º 6.

—(1968): «Bruno Leoni, the Scholar». Il Politico. Vol. XXXIII, N.º 1: pp. 21-25.

—(1975a): «The Pretence of Knowledge». In Les prix Nobel en 1974. Nobel Foundation: Stockholm.

—(1975b): «Inflation, the Misdirection of Labor, and Unem - ployment». Speech addressed in Rome, 8 February, for the international meeting «Il problema della moneta oggi».

—(1975c): Unemployment and Monetary Policy. Government as Generator of the «Business Cycle». The Institute of Economic Affairs: London. Occasional Paper N.º 45.

HUERTA DE SOTO, J. (2010): Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham and Northampton.

LACHMANN, L.M. (1973): Macro-economic Thinking and the Mar-ket Economy. An essay on the neglect of the micro-foundations and its consequences. The Institute of Economic Affairs: Lon-don.

—(1994a): «Austrian Economics under Fire: The Hayek-Sraffa debate in Retrospect». In L.M. Lachmann, Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions. Routledge: London, pp. 147-163.

—(1994b): «G.L.S. Shackle’s Place in the History of Subjectivist Thought». In L.M. Lachmann, Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions. Routledge: London, pp. 235-242.

LAVOIE, D. (1981): «A Critique of the Standard Account of the So-cialist Calculation Debate». The Journal of Libertarian Studies. Vol. V, N.º 1: pp. 41-87.

LEONI, B. (1963): «La ricomparsa delle teorie della pianificazione economica in Occidente». Il Politico. Vol. 3: pp. 451-452 and in La ricomparsa della pianificazione in Occidente. Quaderno N.º 1 of Il Politico: pp. 5-8.

—(1965a): «Il problema del calcolo economico nell’economia di piano». Il Politico. Vol. 3: pp. 415-453.

—(1965b): «Il Contributo del Pareto allo studio del problema del calcolo economico in una società di piano. Il Politico. Vol. 3: pp. 454-460.

—(1965c): «Il mito del piano». In Nuovi studi sulla pianificazione. Quaderno N.º 2 of Il Politico: pp. 5-12.

—(1972): Freedom and the Law. Nash: Los Angeles.

—(2007): Collettivismo e libertà economica. Rubbettino: Soveria Mannelli.

—(2009): Law, Liberty, and the Competitive Market. Transaction: Piscataway.

MISES, L. VON (1935): «Economic Calculation in the Socialist Com-monwealth». In F.A. von Hayek, ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, pp. 87-130.

NARDI SPILLER, C. (2010): «Business Cycles in Italian Tradition». In C. Nardi Spiller and M.A. Galindo, eds., Issues in Econo-mic Thought. Nova Science Publishers: New York, pp. 21-44.

NARDI SPILLER, C., and POMINI, M. (2007): «Profit rate, money and economic dynamics in Fanno’s thought». In A. Giacomin and M.C. Marcuzzo, eds., Money and markets. A doctrinal approach. Routledge: London and New York, pp. 222-237.

OKON, H. (1997): «Katsuichi Yamamoto’s Place in Austrian Eco-nomics and Libertarian Thought». Paper presented at Aus-trian Scholars Conference, April 4-5, Auburn, University, Auburn, ALA, USA.

—(2009): «A Japanese contribution to the calculation de-bate: K. Yamamoto’s Economic Calculation». Paper presen-ted at the 22nd conference of the History of Economic Thought Society of Australia (HETSA 2009) held on 14-17 July, Fremantle Campus, University of Notre Dame, Aus-tralia.

—(2011): «An Early Study of the Possibility of Rational Eco-nomic Calculation in the Socialist Society in Japan: K. Yamamoto’s Economic Calculation (1932)». Paper Presented at the conference of the European Society of History of Economic Thought.

PARETO, V. (1902): Les Systèmes Socialistes. Giard et Brière: Paris.

—(1996): Manuel D’Économie Politique. Libreria Droz: Geneve.

PAVANELLI, V. (2000): «Note sulla teoria austriaca del ciclo e le sue implicazioni di politica economica nel dibattito italiano degli anni Trenta». In V. Gioia and H.D. Kurz, eds., Science, Institutions and Economic Development. The Contribution of «German» Economists and the Reception in Italy (1860-1930). Giuffrè: Milano, pp. 521-541.

REALFONZO, R. (2000): «Note sulla teoria austriaca del ciclo egli economisti italiani nel periodo tra le due guerre». In V. Gioia and H.D. Kurz, eds., Science, Institutions and Economic Develop-ment. The Contribution of «German» Economists and the Re-ception in Italy (1860-1930). Giuffrè: Milano, pp. 543-560.

RONCAGLIA, A. (1990): «Le scuole sraffiane». In G. Becattini, ed., Il pensiero economico: temi, problemi e scuole. Utet: Torino, pp. 233-274.

—(2003): La ricchezza delle idee. Storia del pensiero economico. Laterza: Roma and Bari.

ROTHBARD, M.N. (1991): «The End of Socialism and the Calculation Debate Revisited». The Review of Austrian Economics. Vol. 5, N.º 2: pp. 51-76.

RUFFOLO, G. (2005): Cuori e denari. Dodici grandi economisti raccontati a un profano. Einaudi: Torino.

SCHUMPETER, J.A. (2003): Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy. Taylor & Francis e-library: London and New York.

—(2006): History of Economic Analysis. Taylor & Francis e-li-brary: London and New York.

SRAFFA, P. (1932a): «Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital». Economic Journal. Vol. 42: pp. 42-53.

—(1932b): «A Rejoinder». Economic Journal. Vol. 42: pp. 249-251.

—(1960): Productions of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Ed. It. Produzione di merci a mezzo di merci. Einaudi: Torino, 1960.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bruno Leoni and the socialist economic calculation debate. (2013). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 10(1), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v10i1.202