Individual secession and extraterritoriality

Authors

  • Joakim Kämpe Ludwig von Mises Institute Sweden. Vinodlargatan 2, 11857 Stockholm, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v10i1.206

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to take Mises’ observation on the need for the right of secession in order for the liberal program for peace and prosperity to be realized, and remove the doubts that he voiced regarding the feasibility of extending this right to individuals. We do so by explicating the theoretical and historical foundation of the concept of extraterritoriality, and by showing how extra-, or non-, territoriality is the only system which is consistent with individual rights, private property, and the non-aggression principle. By allowing for individual secession our proposal represents a highly decentralized, dynamically efficient, competitive, voluntary and constantly evolving system, and it would allow for an increasing diversification of law codes fully consistent with people’s subjective wishes.

Key words: Extra-territoriality, Secession, Self-determination, Praxeology.

JEL Classification: A10, A12, K00, K10, N40.

Resumen: El propósito de este ensayo consiste en tomar la observación de Mises acerca de la necesidad de aceptar el derecho de secesión si se pre-tende hacer del programa liberal de paz y responsabilidad una realidad, y eliminar las dudas por él expresadas en relación a la posibilidad de ex-tender tal derecho al individuo. Llevamos a cabo dicha tarea por medio de la explicación de los fundamentos teóricos e históricos del concepto de extra-territorialidad y mostrando cómo la extraterritorialidad (o mejor aún, la no territorialidad) es el único sistema coherente con los derechos individuales, la propiedad privada y el principio de no agresión. Al permitir la secesión individual nuestra propuesta plantea un sistema altamente descentralizado, dinámicamente eficiente, competitivo, voluntario y en constante evolución, que además podría dar lugar a una creciente diversificación de los códigos legales de acuerdo a los deseos subjetivos de los individuos.

Palabras clave: Extraterritorialidad, Secesión, Autodeterminación, Praxeo-logía.

Clasificación JEL: A10, A12, K00, K10, N40.

References

ANDERSON, T. and HILL, P.J. (1977): «An American Experiment in Anarcho-Capitalism: The Not So Wild, Wild West» Journal of Libertarian Studies, pp. 9-29.

BARTOLUS (1914): On the Conflict of Laws, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

BENSON, B.L. (1990): The Enterprise of Law: Justice without the State, San Francisco, Ca., Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.

BLOCK, W. (2011): «Evictionism is Libertarian; Departurism is Not: Critical Comment on Parr», Libertarian Papers, n.º 3.

BOLDRIN, M. and LEVINE, D.K. (2008): Against Intellectual Mono-poly, London, Cambridge University Press.

CASEY, G. (2010): «Reflections on Legal Polycentrism», Journal of Libertarian Studies, pp. 22-34.

CAVE, R.C. and COULSON, H.H. (1936): A Source Book for Medieval Economic History, Milwaukee, The Bruce Publishing Co.

DOLLINGER, Ph. (1999): German Hansa: The Rise of International Business 1200-1800, Routledge.

FREY, B. (2001): «Government Without Territorial Monopoly», The Independent Review VI, n.º 1, pp. 99-112.106 Hoppe (2003).

FRIEDMAN, D. (1973): The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to Radical Capitalism, Open Court Publishing Co.

GORDON, D., ed. (1998): Secession, State and Liberty, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Transaction Publishers.

HAYEK, F.A. (1982): Law, Legislation and Liberty, London, Rout-ledge.

—(1988): The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, London, Routledge.

HELLER, M. (1998): «The Tragedy of the anti-Commons», Harvard Law Review.

HOPPE, H.H. (1988): A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, Las Vegas, University of Nevada.

—(2000): Democracy: The God That Failed, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.

—(2003) ed.: The Myth of National Defense, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute.

HUERTA DE SOTO, J. (2010): Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entre-preneurship, Edward Elgar Publishing.

JOHNSON, R.C.B. (n.d.): «Non-Territorial Governance, Mankind’s Forgotten Legacy.», http://www.panarchy.org/johnsson/review.2005.html (accessed August 09, 2012).

KARSTEN, F. and BECKMAN, K. (2011): «Beyond Democracy», self-published.

KINSELLA, S. (2008): Against Intellectual Property, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute.

LEFEVRE, R. (1966): The Philosophy of Ownership, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute (2007).

LIU, S.S. (1925): Extraterritoriality - Its Rise and Its Decline, New York, Columbia University.

LONG, R. (2002): «Privatization, Viking Style: Model or Misfor-tune?», http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/long1.html (accessed August 09, 2012).

MISES, L. von (1921): «Economic Calculation in the Socialist Com-monwealth», Collectivist Economic Planning, London, Rout-ledge, pp. 87-130.

—(1949): Human Action, San Francisco, Fox & Wilkes (1996).

—(1927): Liberalism, New York, The Foundation of Economic Education (1985).

—(1919): Nation, State and Economy, Institute for Humane Stu-dies (1983).

—(1922): Socialism, New Haven, Yale University Press (1962).

—(1962): «The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science», Princeston, New Jersey, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.

MOLINARI, G. de (1849): The Production of Security, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute (2009).

NOCK, A.J. (1943): Memoirs of a Superfluous Man, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute (2007)

POWELL, J.B. (1925): «Extra-territoriality», China Weekly Review, June, pp. 9-11.

PULSANO, Ph., WOLF, K., ACKER, A., and FRY, D. (1993): Medieval Scandinavia: An encyclopaedia, Taylor & Francis.

RAND, A. (1966): Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, New Ame rican Library.

ROTHBARD, M. (1973): For a New Liberty, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute (2006).

—(1982): Ethics of Liberty, New York, New York University Press (1998).

—(1981): «The Laissez-Faire Radical: A Quest for the Historical Mises», Journal of Libertarian Studies, n.º 3, pp. 237-253.

RUNOLFSSON, B.T. (n.d.): «Ordered Anarchy: Evolution of the De-centralized Legal Order in the Icelandic Commonwealth», https://notendur.hi.is/~bthru/iep.htm (accessed Sep-tember 02, 2012).

SAMUELSSON, P.O. (n.d.): «Mises om Anarkism», Nattväktaren, http://www.nattvakt.com/nnv/110318misesomanarkism.htm (accessed August 9, 2012).

SCHAFFER, B. (2009): The Boundaries of Order: Private Property as a Social Order, Auburn, Al., Ludwig von Mises Institute.

SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Taylor & Francis (2003).

SCOTT, S.P. trans. (1910): The Visigothic Code, Boston, Boston Book Company.

SMITH, A.T. (1989): Time and Public Policy, University of Tennessee Press.

STRINGHAM, E. and ZYWICKY, T.J. (2011): Hayekian Anarchism, George Mason University.

TANNEHILL, L. and MORRIS (1970): The Market for Liberty, San Fran-cisco, Fox & Wilkes (1993).

WEBER, M. (1919): «Politics as a vocation», From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York, Oxford University Press (1946), pp. 77-128.

WHISTON, Th. (2002): «Medieval Iceland and the Absence of Go-vernment», http://www.mises.org/daily/1121 (accessed September 02, 2012).

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Individual secession and extraterritoriality. (2013). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 10(1), 195-239. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v10i1.206