This is an outdated version published on 2019-09-21. Read the most recent version.

Toward a More Relevant Theory of Economic Expansion and Development: Insights from Ludwig von Mises

Authors

  • Shawn Ritenour Grove City College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v16i2.22

Abstract

 The history of modern growth theory can be characterized as a run- ning debate between capital fundamentalism and technological fundamental- ism. Both sides of the debate rely on mathematical models that suffer from problems of aggregation and serious limitations due to their assumptions. The economic framework and insights of Ludwig von Mises provide theoretical results pointing to a more robust and relevant theory of economic progress. Mises’ emphasis on the market division of labor, capital formation, innovation, and entrepreneurship allow for the development of a more holistic theory of economic expansion and development that, therefore, is more likely to provide helpful policy guidance for purposes of economic progress.

Keywords: Economic growth, Economic development, Entrepreneurship, Eco- nomic Institutions.

JEL classification: O11, O40, L26, D24, O33, B25, B53.

Resumen: La historia de la teoría moderna del crecimiento puede caracteri- zarse como un debate continuo entre el fundamentalismo capital y el funda- mentalismo tecnológico. Ambas partes del debate se basan en modelos matemáticos que sufren problemas de agregación y serias limitaciones debido a sus suposiciones. El marco económico y las ideas de Ludwig von Mises pro- porcionan resultados teóricos que apuntan a una teoría más sólida y relevante del progreso económico. El énfasis de Mises en la división de mercado del tra- bajo, la formación de capital, la innovación y el emprendimiento permiten el desarrollo de una teoría más holística de expansión y desarrollo económico que, por lo tanto, es más probable que proporcione una orientación política útil para los fines del progreso económico.

Palabras clave: Crecimiento económico, Desarrollo económico, Emprendi- miento, Instituciones Económicas.

Clasificación JEL: O11, O40, L26, D24, O33, B25, B53.

References

Abramovitz, M. (1956): “Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870”, Occasional Paper No. 52, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.

Alesina, A. and S. Ardagna (2010): “Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending” in Jeffrey R. Brown, ed. Tax policy and the economy, Vol. 24 Chicago, University of Chicago Press, pp. 35-68.

Alesina, A., O. Barbiero, C. Favero, F. Givavazzi, and M. Paradisi (2015): “Austerity in 2009-13” Economic Policy, Vol 30, No. 83, pp. 383-437.

Armentano, D. T. (1990): Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure. 2nd ed. Oakland, The Independent Institute.

Arndt, H. W. (1987): Economic Development: The History of an Idea. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Batemarco, R. (1987): “GNP, PPR, and the Standard of Living.” The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 181-86.

Barnett II, W. and W. Block (2016): “Gross Output — Another Gov- ernment Con.” Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, Vol. XIII, No. 2, pp. 13-39.

Boettke, P. J. ed. (1994): The Collapse of Development Planning. New York, New York University Press.

Bureau of Economic Analysis (2018): “What is gross output by industry and how does it differ from gross domestic product (or value added) by industry?” Accessed on-line at https://www.bea.gov/help/faq/1246 on 21 September 2019.

Colander, D. (2014): “Gross Output.” Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 451-455.

Coyne, C. and P. J. Boettke (2006): “The Role of the Economist in Economic Development.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Eco- nomics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 47-68.

Denison, E. F. (1962): Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Choices before US. New York, Committee for Economic Development.

— (1967): Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Domar, E. (1946): “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employ- ment.” Econometrica, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 137-147.

Easterly, W. (2002): The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adven- tures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, The MIT Press. Fabricant, S. (1954): “Economic Progress and Economic Change”. National Bureau of Economic Research 34th Annual Report, pp. 3-18.

Garrison, R. W. (2001): Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capi- tal Structure. New York, Routledge.

Giavazzi, F. and M. Pagano (1990): “Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries”, in Blanchard J. Olivier, Fischer Stanley (eds), NBER Macroeconom- ics Annual 1990, pp. 75-122. Cambridge, MIT Press.

Harper, D. A. (2003): Foundations of Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. London: Routledge.

Harrod, R. F. (1939): “An Essay in Dynamic Theory.” The Economic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 193, pp. 14-33.

Helpman, E. (2004): The Mystery of Economic Growth. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Higgs, R. (1997): “Regime Uncertainty: Why the Great Depression Lasted So Long and Why Prosperity Resumed after the War.” The Independent Review, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 561-590.

High, J. (2009): “Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The The- ory of Emergent Institutions,” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 3-36.

Holcombe, R. G. (1998): “Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 45-62. Huerta de Soto, J. (2006): Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles. Auburn, The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

— (2008): The Austrian School: Market Order and Entrepreneurial Cre- ativity. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Jorgenson, D. W. and Zvi. Griliches (1972): “Issues in Growth Accounting: A Reply to Edward F. Denison,” Survey of Current Business, Part II, pp. 65-94.

Jorgenson, D. W. (1991): “Productivity and Economic Growth.” In Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. Edited by Ernst R. Berndt and Jack E. Triplett, pp. 19-118. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

King, R. G. and R. Levine (1994): “Capital Fundamentalism, Eco- nomic Development and Economic Growth.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 40, pp. 259-292.

Levy, D. M. and S. J. Peart (2011): “Soviet Growth and American Textbooks: An Endogenous Past.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 78, No. 1-2, pp. 110-125

Lewis, W. A. (1954): “Economic Development with Unlimited Sup- plies of Labor.” The Manchester School of Economic and Social Stud- ies, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 139-191.

Manish, G. P. and B. Powell (2014): “Capital Theory and the Process of Inter-Temporal Coordination: The Austrian Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 133-142.

Mccloskey, D. (2016): Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Insti- tutions, Enriched the World. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Mises, L. Von (1952): The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality. Princeton, Von

Nostrand

— (1977): The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science. Kansas City, Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc.

— (1980a): “Profit and Loss.” In Planning for Freedom and Sixteen Other Essays and Addresses, 4th edition, pp. 108-150. South Hol- land, Libertarian Press.

— (1980b): “Capital Supply and American Prosperity.” In Planning for Freedom and Sixteen Other Essays and Addresses, 4th edition, pp. 195-214. South Holland, Libertarian Press.

— (1981): Socialism, Indianapolis, Liberty Press.

— (1983): Bureaucracy. Cedar Falls, Center for Futures Education.

— (1985): Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. Spring Hills, Libertarian Press.

— (1998): Human Action. Scholars Edition. Auburn, The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

— (1990b): “The Plight of the Underdeveloped Nations.” In Money, Method, and the Market Process, edited by Richard M. Ebeling, pp. 168-173. Auburn, The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

— (2003): Epistemological Problems of Economics. Auburn, The Lud- wig von Mises Institute. Pieper, J. [1952] (1963): Leisure: The Basis of Culture. New York: Ran- dom House, Incorporated.

Reekie, W. D. (1979): Industry, Prices and Markets. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Ritenour, S. (2000): “Post-Modern Economics: The Return of Depres- sion Economics by Paul Krugman.” The Quarterly Journal of Aus- trian Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 79-83.

— (2010): Foundations of Economics: A Christian View. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

Romer, P. M. (1994): “The Origins of Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 3-22.

— (1990): “Endogenous Technical Change.” Journal of Political Econ- omy, Vol. 98, No. 5, pp. S71-102.

Rosenberg, N. and L. E. Birdzell, Jr. (1986): How the West Grew Rich. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

Salerno, J. (1990): “Ludwig von Mises as Social Rationalist.” The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 26-54.

Shapiro, M. M. (2007): Foundations of the Market Price System. Auburn, The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Shenoy, S. R. (1991): “Austrian Capital Theory and the Underdevel- oped Areas: An Overview.” Austrian Economics: Perspectives on the Past and Prospects for the Future edited by Richard Ebeling, pp. 379-423. Hillsdale, Hillsdale College Press.

— (2007): “Investment Chains Through History or an Historian’s Outline of Development: Using Goods of Ever Higher Orders.” Indian Journal of Economics and Business, Special Issue, pp. 185-215.

— (2010): Towards a Theoretical Framework for British and International Economic History: Early Modern England, a Case Study, Auburn, The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Skousen, M. (2015): “Linking Austrian and Keynesian Economics: A Variation on a Theme.” The Journal of Private Enterprise, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 97-112.

— (2017): “Blocking Progress in Austrian Economics: A Rejoin- der.” Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, Vol. XIV, No. 2, pp. 153-172.

Solow, R. M. (1956): “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1 (Feb.), pp. 65-94.

— (1957): “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Func- tion.” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, pp. 312-320.

— (2000): Growth Theory: An Exposition, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

— (2002): “Neoclassical Growth Model.” In An Encyclopedia of Mac- roeconomics, edited by Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, pp. 518-521. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Young, A. (2009): “A Capital-Based Theory of Secular Growth.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 36-51.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-21

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Toward a More Relevant Theory of Economic Expansion and Development: Insights from Ludwig von Mises. (2019). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 16(2), 13-42. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v16i2.22