A Primary Comparative Analysis and Integration of the Hayekian- Laozian Theories of Knowledge, Market Process and Law

Authors

  • William Hongsong Wang University of Madrid
  • Javier Car Amés Sánchez National Taiwan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v16i2.26

Abstract

The thought of Hayek has been a topic of considerable interest for a while now and the studies of Laozi’s philosophy have also been drawing increasing attention worldwide. In particular, increasingly people seek answers to current political, economic and social questions within Laozi’s wis- dom of more than 2000 years ago. By comparing and integrating the theo- ries of Hayek and Laozi, this paper uncovers new insights into the ideas of Laozi and how they align with some of Hayek’s central ideas. Firstly, this arti- cle makes a comparative analysis of the theories of Hayek and Laozi based on their original works, particularly through the authors’ new translation of the original Chinese texts of Laozi. Further, this paper shows how the ideas of authors overlap and are complimentary and therefore proposes a Hayekian-Laozian perspective that informs the idea of entrepreneurship. Therefore, this paper not only seeks to show that Laozi anticipated modern economic insights but that these modern insights can also be integrated into a more detailed theory.

Keywords: Hayek, Laozi, market competition, Daodejing.

JEL classification: A12, D4, B11, B22, B53, D83, K2, L26.

Resumen: El pensamiento de Hayek ha sido un tema de considerable interés desde hace tiempo y los estudios de la filosofía de Laozi también están lla- mando una creciente atención a nivel global. En particular, las personas cada vez buscan más respuestas a cuestiones políticas, económicas y socia- les actuales dentro de la sabiduría de Laozi de hace más de 2000 años. Comparando e integrando las teorías de Hayek y Laozi, este trabajo descu- bre nuevas perspectivas en las ideas de Laozi y cómo se alinean con algu- nas de las ideas centrales de Hayek. En primer lugar, este artículo hace un análisis comparativo de las teorías de Hayek y Laozi basado en sus trabajos originales, en particular a partir de la nueva traducción de los textos origi- nales en chino de Laozi llevada a cabo por los autores de este trabajo. Ade- más, este trabajo muestra cómo las ideas de ambos autores se solapan y son complementarias y por tanto propone una persepctiva hayekio-laoziana sobre la idea de empresarialidad. Así, este trabajo no sólo busca poner de manifiesto que Laozi anticipó conocimientos económicos modernos, sino también que estos conocimientos modernos pueden integrarse en una teoría más detallada.

Palabras clave: Hayek, Laozi, competencia de mercado, Daodejing.

Clasificación JEL: A12, D4, B11, B22, B53, D83, K2, L26.

 

References

Boettke, P. J. (2005): “Anarchism as a progressive research program in political economy.” In E. Stringham (Ed.), Anarchy, State and Public Choice (pp. 206-219). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

Ebner, A. (2005): “Hayek on entrepreneurship: Competition, mar- ket process and cultural evolution.” In J. Backhaus (Ed.), Entre- preneurship, money and coordination (pp. 131-149). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Feng, X. (馮興元). (2014): 從老子“無為而治”到哈耶克“自發秩序” [From Laozi’s “wuwei” to Hayek’s “Spontaneous Order”]. Retrieved May 1, 2018, from http://blog.caijing.com.cn/expert_article-151502-74468.shtml

Graham, A. C. (1989): Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. Chicago: Open Court.

Hayek, F. A. (1945): “The use of knowledge in society.” The Ameri- can Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.

— (1960): The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

— (1966): “The principles of a liberal social order.” Il politico, 601-618.

— (1973): Law, legislation and liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy (Vol. 1). London: Rout- ledge.

— (1979): Law, legislation and liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy (Vol. 3). London: Rout- ledge.

— (1944/2001): The road to serfdom. London: Routledge.

— (2014): The road to serfdom: Text and documents: The definitive edi- tion. London: Routledge.

Heshangong. (河上公) (1993): In K. Wang (Ed.), 老子道德經河上公章句 [Laozi’s Daodejing with the interpretation of Heshanggong]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

Huerta de Soto, J. (2009): The theory of dynamic efficiency. London: Routledge.

— (2010): Socialism, economic calculation and entrepreneurship. Chel- tenham: Edward Elgar.

Klein, P. G. (2010): The Capitalist and the entrepreneur: Essays on organ- izations and markets. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Laozi (老子). (1980): In Y. Lou. (Ed.), 王弼集校释 [The Proofreading and explanation of the collective works of Wang Bi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

— (1993): In K. Wang. (Ed.), 老子道德經河上公章句 (Laozi’s Daode- jing with the interpretation of Heshanggong). Beijing: Zhong- hua Book Company.

Long, R. T. (2003): “Austro-libertarian themes in early Confucian- ism.” Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17(3), 35-62.

Lou, Y. (楼宇烈) (ed.) (1980): 王弼集校释 [The proofreading and explanation of the collective Works of Wang Bi]. Beijing: Zhon- ghua Book Company.

Mises, L. v. (1949/1998): Human action. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

McIntosh, C. (eds.) (2013): Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Olson, M. (2000): Power and prosperity: Outgrowing communist and capitalist dictatorships. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Qian, M. (錢穆) (1988): 論語新解 [The new explanation of the Ana- lects]. Taipei: Dongda. (東大出版社).

Rothbard, M. N. (1962/2009): Man, Economy, and State. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Rothbard, M. N. (1995): Economic thought before Adam Smith. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Schwartz, B. I. (2009): The world of thought in ancient China. Cam- bridge: Harvard University Press.

Slingerland, E. (2007): Effortless action: Wu-wei as conceptual meta- phor and spiritual ideal in early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stringham, E. P., & Zywicki, T. J. (2011): “Hayekian anarchism.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78(3), 290-301.

Wang, B. (王弼) (1980): In Y. Lou. (Ed.), 王弼集校释 [The proofread- ing and explanation of the collective works of Wang Bi]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

Wang, K. (王卡) (ed.) (1993): 老子道德經河上公章句 [Laozi’s Daodejing with the Interpretation of Heshanggong]. Beijing: Zhonghua.

Ziporyn, B. (2009): Introduction. In B. Ziporyn (Trans.), Zhuangzi: The essential writings with selections from traditional Commentaries (pp. xvi-xvii). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Zong, B. (宗邦福) et al. (eds.) (2003): 故訓匯纂 [The corpus of ancient glosses]. Beijing: Commercial Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Primary Comparative Analysis and Integration of the Hayekian- Laozian Theories of Knowledge, Market Process and Law. (2019). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 16(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v16i2.26