La originalidad de la economía marginalista de Jeremy Bentham

Authors

  • Estrella Trincado Aznar Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Agradezco los comentarios de Car-los Rodríguez Braun.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v2i2.356

Abstract

In this paper, we present some Bentham’s theory features that make him precursor of marginalist economics. The author described the ideas of decreasing marginal utility and equimarginality, he made a commodity classification that distinguished between an upper and a lower class of goods depending on the proximity to use and his defi-nition of property as an expectation of possession lead him to develop an economic theory based on individual information search. At the same time, he attached special importance to the figure of the innovative entrepreneur and described the market as a discovery process in which the central agent is the entrepreneur.

Key words: Bentham, marginalist economics, entrepreneur.

Clasificación JEL: B12.

Resumen: En este artículo, se demuestra que la teoría de Jeremy Bentham es precursora de la economía marginalista. El autor intro-dujo las ideas de utilidad marginal decreciente, la equimarginalidad en el intercambio, realizó una clasificación entre bienes superiores e inferiores y su definición de la propiedad como una expectativa de pose-sión le llevó a desarrollar una teoría económica basada en la búsqueda individual de información. Así mismo, dio especial importancia a la figura del empresario innovador y describió el mercado como un pro-ceso de descubrimiento en que el agente central es el empresario.

Palabras clave: Bentham, economía marginalista, empresario.

References

BENTHAM, Jeremy (1981), Tratados de legislación civil y penal, Madrid, Editora Nacional.

BONNER, John (1995), Economic Efficiency and Social Justice: The Development of Utilitarian Ideas in Economics from Bentham to Edgeworth, Aldershot, Edward Elgar Publishing.

CAMPOS BORALEVI, Lea (1984), Bentham and the oppressed, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

COLLISON BLACK, R.D. (1988), «Bentham and the Political Eco-nomists of the Nineteenth Century», The Bentham News-letter, 12, junio.

DUBE, Allison (1990), «Hayek on Bentham», Utilitas, 2, 1, mayo, pp. 71-87.

—(1991), The Theme of Acquisitiveness in Bentham’s Political Thought, New York, Garland publising.

HALÉVY, Elie (1928), The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism, Lon-don, Faber and Faber.

HAYEK, Friedrich A.. (1932), «A note on the Development of the Doctrine of Forced Saving», The Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics, vol. XLVI, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, pp. 123-133.

HÉBERT, R.F. y LINK, A.N. (1988), The Entrepreneur. Mainstream Views and Radical Critics, New York, Praeger.

HEBERTON EVANS JR, G. (1949), «The Entrepreneur and Economic Theory, a Historical and Analytical Approach», The Ame-rican Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, XXXIX, mayo, 337-38.

HOLLANDER, S. (1973), The Economics of Adam Smith, London, Heinemann Educational Books.

HUERTA DE SOTO, Jesús (2000), La Escuela Austriaca, mercado y creatividad empresarial, Madrid, Editorial Síntesis.

—(2001), Socialismo, cálculo económico y función empresarial, Madrid, Unión Editorial, 3.ª edición [2005].

KIRZNER, Israel M. (1973), Competencia y empresarialidad, 2.ª edi-ción, Madrid, Unión Editorial [1998].

KNIGHT, Frank H. (1921), Riesgo, Incertidumbre y Beneficio, Madrid, Aguilar [1947].

LELOUP, Sandrine (2002), «El liberalismo económico, a prueba en Bentham: Panóptico y mercado de crédito», Télos. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas, X, 2, 2001, Santiago de Compostela, SIEU, pp. 7-20.

MENGER, Carl (1984), Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, New York, New York University Press [1883].

MISES, Ludwig von (1949), La Acción Humana. Tratado de Econo-mía, 7.ª edición, Unión Editorial, Madrid [2004].

NELSON, Richard R. y SYDNEY, Winter G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

PESCIARELLI, Enzo (1989), «Smith, Bentham and the Develop-ment of Contrasting Ideas on Entrepreneurship», History of Political Economy, 21, 3, 521-36.

POPPER, Karl (1957), La miseria del historicismo, Madrid, Taurus [1961].

RAE, John (1895), Life of Adam Smith, Londres, Macmillan.

RODRÍGUEZ BRAUN, Carlos (1989), La cuestión colonial y la econo-mía clásica, Madrid, Alianza.

ROTHBARD, Murray N. (1982), La ética de la libertad, Madrid, Unión Editorial [1995].

SANTOS REDONDO, Manuel (1997), Los economistas y la empresa. Empresa y empresario en la historia del pensamiento económico, Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. (1949), Change and the Entrepreneur, Re-search Center in Entrepreneurial History, Harvard Uni-versity.

—(1954), History of Economic Analysis, Oxford, Oxford Uni-versity Press.

—(1949), «La teoría económica y la historia empresarial», Ensayos, Barcelona, Oikos-Tau [1966], pp. 255-272.

SCHWARTZ, Pedro (1976), «La influencia de Bentham en España», Información Comercial Española, n.º 517, septiembre, pp. 52-56.

—(1986), «Jeremy Bentham´s Democratic Despotism», Ideas in Economics, ed. by R.D. Collison Black, Basingstoke, Macmillan Press, pp. 74-103.

SPENGLER, Joseph J. (1975), «Adam Smith and Society's Deci-sion-Makers», Essays on Adam Smith, Skinner. A.S. y Wil-son, T. (eds.), Oxford, pp. 397-400.

STARK, Werner (1952a), Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings. Cri-tical Edition Based in his Printed Works and Unprinted Manuscripts, vol. 1, Londres, Published for The Royal Econo-mic Society by George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

—(1952b), Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings. Critical Edi-tion Based in his Printed Works and Unprinted Manuscripts, vol. 2, Londres, Published for The Royal Economic Society by George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

—(1954), Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings. Critical Edition Based in his Printed Works and Unprinted Manuscripts, vol. 3, Londres, Published for The Royal Economic Society by George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2005-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

La originalidad de la economía marginalista de Jeremy Bentham. (2005). REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO, 2(2), 119-149. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v2i2.356