The Non-Aggression Principle: a Short History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v16i1.36Abstract
This paper traces the historical origins of the non-aggression princi- ple. The central thesis of this paper is that a large and diverse group of history’s most eminent thinkers have expressed ideas very similar to the non-aggression principle. The rudiments of the principle were known to the ancient Egyptians around 2000 BC, the ancient Hindus around 1500 BC, and the ancient Hebrews around 1000 BC. Around 500 BC, the ancient Chinese and Greek philosophers expressed the underlying logic of the principle. Cicero came close to articulating the principle in its modern form. Thomas Aquinas reasserted something strikingly similar to non-aggression after the Dark Ages, and the scholastic philosophers carried the idea into the early modern period. During the seventeenth century, the non-aggression principle rose to the pinnacle of Western philosophy.
JEL Classification: B11, B12, K00, P14
Keywords: Non-aggression principle, ethics, libertarianism
Resumen: Este artículo traza los orígenes históricos del principio de no agresión. La tesis central es que un amplio y diverso grupo compuesto por algunos de los pensadores más importantes de la historia ha expresado ideas muy similares al principio de no agresión. Los rudimentos de dicho principio eran conocidos por los antiguos egipcios hacia el 2000 a. C., por los hindúes hacia el 1500 a. C., y por los antiguos hebreos hacia el 1000 a. C. Hacia el 500 a. C., los antiguos chinos y los filósofos griegos expresaron la lógica subyacente del principio. Cicerón se acercó a la articulación del principio en su forma mod- erna. Tomás de Aquino reafirmó algo sorprendentemente similar a la no agresión después de la Edad Oscura, y los teólogos católicos llevaron la idea hasta el periodo moderno. Durante el siglo XVII, el principio de no agresión se elevó al pináculo de la filosofía occidental.
Clasificación JEL: B11, B12, K00, P14
Palabras clave: Principio de no agresión, ética, libertarianismo
“No one may threaten or commit violence (“aggress”) against another man’s person or property. Violence may be employed only against the man who commits such violence; that is, only defen- sively against the aggressive violence of another. In short, no vio- lence may be employed against a nonaggressor.”
— Murray N. Rothbard 1974, 116 “The use of coercion can be justified only where this is neces- sary to secure the private domain of the individual against inter- ference by others … coercion should not be used to interfere in that
private sphere where this is not necessary to protect others.”
— Friedrich Hayek 1976, 221
References
Adams, J. (1763): “On Private Revenge”, in C.F. Adams (ed.), The Works of John Adams, Vol. 3, 438–44, Boston, Charles C. Little & James Brown.
Azo. (1210): Selected Passages from the Works of Bracton and Azo, Pro- fessional Books for the Seldon Society, 1978.
Bastiat, F. (1845): “Economic Sophisms – Second Series”, in M. Thornton (ed.), The Bastiat Collection, 305–430, Auburn, AL, Lud- wig von Mises Institute, 2007.
— (1850a): “The Law”, in M. Thornton (ed.), The Bastiat Collection, 49–94, Auburn, AL, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007.
— (1850b): “Harmonies of Political Economy (Book Two)”, in M. Thornton (ed.), The Bastiat Collection, 785–1024, Auburn, AL, Ludwig von Mises Institute.
— (1850c): “Harmonies of Political Economy (Book One)”, in M. Thornton (ed.), The Bastiat Collection, 431–784, Auburn, AL, Lud- wig von Mises Institute, 2007.
Bentham, J. (1802): The Theory of Legislation, London, Trubner & Co., 1862.
Block, W. (1976): Defending the Undefendable, Auburn, AL, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008.
Bracton, H. (1268): On the Laws and Customs of England, Vol. 2, Cam- bridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1968.
Budge, E.A.W. (1913): The Book of the Dead: The Papyrus of Ani, Vol. 2, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Burlamaqui, J.J. (1747): The Principles of Natural and Politic Law, Indi- anapolis, Liberty Fund, 2006.
Carmichael, G. (1707): “Philosophical Thesis: On Natural Law”, in J. Moore and M. Silverthorne (eds.), Natural Rights on the Thresh- old of the Scottish Enlightenment: The Writings of Gershom Carmi- chael, 357–376, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2002.
Coke, E. (1610): “William Aldred’s Case.” In S. Sheppard (ed.), The Selected Writings and Speeches of Sir Edward Coke, Vol. 1, 308-13, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2003.
Condorcet, M.J.A.N. (1796): Outlines of an Historical View of the Pro- gress of the Human Mind, Philadelphia: M. Carey.
Chandler, K. (2004): “How Ancient is the Vedic Tradition?”, in R.K. Pruthi (ed.), Vedic Civilization, 277–88. New Delhi, Discovery Publishing House.
De Tracy, C.D. (1811): A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s ‘Spirit of Laws’, Philadelphia, William Duane.
— (1817): A Treatise on Political Economy, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2011.
Ferguson, A. (1767): An Essay on the History of Civil Society, London, T. Cadell, 1782.
— (1792): Principles of Moral and Political Science, Vol. 2, London, Strahan & Cadell.
Franklin, B. (1784): “The Autobiography, Part 2”, in A. Houston (ed.), Franklin: The Autobiography and Other Writings on Politics, Economics, and Virtue, 58–73, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
— (1785): “On the Elective Franchises Enjoyed by the Small Bor- oughs in England”, in J. Bigelow (ed.), The Works of Benjamin Franklin, Vol. 12, 56-59, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904.
Grotius, H. (1603): Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty, Indian- apolis, Liberty Fund, 2006.
— (1625): The Rights of War and Peace, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2005.
Guthrie, W.K.C. (1971a): The Sophists, New York, Cambridge Uni- versity Press.
— (1971b): Socrates, New York, Cambridge University Press. Hayek, F.A. (1976): “The Mirage of Social Justice”, in Law, Legislation, and Liberty, London, Routledge Classics, 2013.
Heineccius, J.G. (1738): A Methodical System of Universal Law: Or, the Laws of Nature and Nations, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2008.
Higgs, H. (1897): The Physiocrats: Six Lectures on the French Econo- mistes of the 18th Century, London, Macmillan and Co.
Hobbes, T. (1651): Leviathan, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998. Home, H. (1760): Principles of Equity, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2014.
Humboldt, W. (1792): The Sphere and Duties of Government, London, John Chapman, 1854.
Hume, D. (1738): “A Treatise on Human Nature”, in The Philosophi- cal Works of David Hume, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, Adam Black and William Tait, 1826.
— (1751): “An Inquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals”, in The Philosophical Works of David Hume, Vol. 4, 238–431, Edinburgh, Adam Black and William Tait, 1826.
— (1752): “On the Original Contract”, in The Philosophical Works of David Hume, Vol. 3, 509–32, Edinburgh, Adam Black and Wil- liam Tait, 1826.
— (1761): The History of England, Vol. 6, London, J. Wallis by W. Bul- mer and Co., 1803.
— (1777): “Of the Origin of Government”, in K. Haakonssen (ed.), Hume: Political Essays, 20–23, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Hutcheson, F. (1742): Philosophiae Moralis Institutio Compendiaria, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2007.
Huerta de Soto, J. (1992): Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entre- preneurship, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2010.
— (2000): The Austrian School, Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar, 2008.
— (2009): “Classical Liberalism versus Anarcho-Capitalism”, in J. Hulsmann and S. Kinsella (eds.), Property, Freedom, & Society, 161-78, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Jefferson, T. (1770): “Argument in the Case of Howell vs. Nether- land”, in P.L. Ford (ed.), The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 1, 470– 81, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904.
— (1785): “Notes on Virginia.” In P.L. Ford (ed.), The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 4, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904.
— (1793): “Jefferson to the French Minister Edmond Charles Genet”, in P.L. Ford (ed.), The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 7, 396–401, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1905.
— (1801): “First Inaugural Address”, in S.H. Browne (ed.), Jefferson’s Call for Nationhood: The First Inaugural Address, xiii-xvii, College Station, Texas A&M University Press, 2003.
— (1813): “Thomas Jefferson to Pierre Samuel Du Pont de Nemours, 29 November”, in D. Malone (ed.), Correspondence Between Thomas Jefferson And Pierre Samuel Du Pont De Nemours 1789– 1817, 145–50, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1930.
— (1816): “Jefferson to Francis Walker Gilmer.” In P.L. Ford (ed.), The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 11, 533–36, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1905.
— (1821): “Autobiography.” In P.L. Ford (ed.), The Works of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. 1, 3–162, New York, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904.
Kant, I. (1781): “Appendix from The Critique of Pure Reason”, in H.S. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
— (1785): “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, in M.J. Gre- gor (ed.), Practical Philosophy, 37–108, New York, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1996.
— (1793): “On the Common Saying: This May be True in Theory, But it Does Not Apply in Practice”, in H.S. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Polit- ical Writings, 61–92, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
— (1795): “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch”, in H.S. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings, 92–130, New York, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1991.
— (1797): “Metaphysics of Morals”, in Practical Philosophy, 353–603, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Karenga, M. (1989): Selections from the Husia, Los Angeles, Univer- sity of Sankore Press.
Keynes, J.M. (1926): “The End of Laissez-Faire”, in The Collected Works of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 9, 272-94, London, Macmillan and Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Soci- ety.
Leibniz, G. (1693): “Codex Iuris Gentium”, in P. Riley (ed.), G .W . Lei- bniz: Political Writings, 165–76, Cambridge, Cambridge Univer- sity Press.
Lichtheim, M. (1973): Ancient Egyptian Literature, Berkeley, Univer- sity of California Press.
Locke, J. (1689): “Two Treatises of Government”, in The Works of John Locke, Vol. 4, 207–485, London, Rivington, 1824.
Long, R. (2003): “Austro-Libertarian Themes in Early Confucian- ism”, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 17, 3, pp. 35–62.
— (2008): “Nonaggression Axiom”, in R. Hamoway (ed.), The Encyclo- pedia of Libertarianism, 357–60, Washington, DC, Sage Publications. Luther, M. (1520): “To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation Concerning the Reform of the Christian Estate”, in Works of Martin Luther, Vol. 2, 61-164, Philadelphia, Muhlenberg Press,
— (1530): “Luther to the Elector John of Saxony, March 6”, in Luther’s Correspondence and Other Contemporary Letters, Vol. 2, 518–22, Philadelphia, Lutheran Publication Society, 1913.
Mariana, J. (1598): The King and the Education of the King, Washing- ton, DC, Country Dollar Press, 1948.
— (1609): “A Treatise on the Alteration of Money”, Journal of Mar- kets & Morality, 5, 2, pp. 523–93.
Mill, J.S. (1859): “On Liberty”, in J.M Robson (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 18, Essays on Politics and Society Part I, 213– 310, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.
— (1863): “Utilitarianism”, in J.M Robson (ed.), Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 10, Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society, 203–60, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
Milton, J. (1648): “The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates”, in R.W. Griswold (ed.), The Prose Works of John Milton, Vol. 1, 374–99, Philadelphia: John W. Moore, 1847.
Mises, L.V. (1949): Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1998.
Mulgan, R. G. (1979): “Lycophron and Greek Theories of Social Contract”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 40, 1, pp. 121–28.
Nemours, P.S.D.P. (1768): De l’Origine et des Progrès d’une Science Nouvelle, Paris, Librairie Paul Geuthner, 1910 .
Oresme, N. (1350): “Treatise on the Origin, Nature, Law, and Alterations of Money”, in C. Johnson (ed.), The De Moneta of Nicholas Oresme and English Mint Documents, London, Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1956.
Popper, K.R. (1945): The Open Society and its Enemies, Vol. 1: The Spell of Plato, London, George Routledge & Sons.
Price, R. (1789): A Discourse on the Love of Our Country, London, T. Cadell.
Pufendorf, S. (1660): Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurispru- dence, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2009.
— (1673): On the Duty of Man and Citizen, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Rothbard, M.N. (1962): Man, Economy and State: A Treatise on Eco- nomic Principles. Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2004.
— (1974): “War Peace and the State”, in D. Gordon (ed.), Egalitarian- ism as a Revolt Against Nature, 115–32, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2000.
— (1982a): “Law, Property Right, and Air Pollution”, in Economic Controversies, 367–418, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.
— (1982b): The Ethics of Liberty, New York, New York University Press.
— (1995): Economic Thought Before Adam Smith, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2006.
— (1996): “New Light on the Prehistory of the Austrian School”, in Economic Controversies, 139–60, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.
Riviere, M. (1767): L’ordre Naturel et Essentiel des Sociétés Politiques, Paris, Librairie Paul Geuthner, 1910.
Say, J.B. (1803): A Treatise on Political Economy, New York, Augustus M. Kelley, 1971.
Smith, A. (1759): The Theory of Moral Sentiments, London, Henry G. Bohn, 1853.
— (1763): Lectures on Justice, Police, Revenue and Arms, Oxford, Clar- endon Press, 1869.
— (1776): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Vol. 2 London, Methuen, 1904.
Spencer, H. (1851): Social Statics, London, John Chapman.
— (1879a): The Principles of Ethics, Vol. 1, Indianapolis, Liberty Clas- sics, 1978.
— (1879b): The Principles of Ethics, Vol. 2, Indianapolis, Liberty Clas- sics, 1978.
— (1884): The Man Versus the State, Indianapolis, Liberty Classics, 1981.
Thomasius, C. (1688): Institutes of Divine Jurisprudence, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2011.
Turgot, A.R.J. (1753): “Miscellaneous Extracts: Individual Free- dom”, in D. Gordon (ed), The Turgot Collection, 514–15, Auburn, Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011.
Vattel, E. (1758): The Law of Nations, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2008.
Weiss, R. (2007): “Wise Guys and Smart Alecks in Republic 1 and 2”, in G.R.F. Ferrari (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, 90-115, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Whately, R. (1833): Easy Lessons of Money Matters: For the Use of Young People, London, John W. Parker and Son, West Strand, 1853.
