TIME PREFERENCE: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE AUSTRIAN SCHOOL AND A DEBATE ON THE HYPERBOLIC DISCOUNT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v19i2.768Abstract
Abstract: From the central axiom of human action is deduced the universal law of time preference: the individual prefers that his ends be reached in the shortest possible time, he prefers to consume in the present than to consume in the future. From the difference between the value that the individual attributes to a good in the present and to the same good in the future, the interest rate emerges as a fundamental element of the intertemporal coordination of the economy. From the theoretical framework of the Austrian School, this paper discusses the hyperbolic discount model, proposed by the Behavioral Economics, as a way of describing time preference. This paper emphasizes that for an adequate intertemporal allocation of resources to occur, the interest rate that allows efficient intermediation between savers and investors and its calculation formula must be discovered through voluntary transactions in the market.
Keywords: Austrian School; time preference; interest rate; Behavioral Economics; hyperbolic discounting.
JEL Classification: B53; D01; E43.
References
Angeletos, G. et al. (2001): «The hyperbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation», Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), pp. 47-68.
Benzion, U.; Rapoport, A.; Yagil, J. (1989): «Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions – an Experimental-Study», Management Science, 35(3), pp. 270-284.
Böhm-Bawerk, E. von (1890): Capital and Intrest, a critical history of economical theory, Macmillan & Co, London and New York.
Camerer, C.; Loewenstein, G. (2004): «Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future», In Camerer, C.; Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M. (eds) Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton University Press, pp. 3-51.
Chapman, G. B.; Elstein, A.S. (1995): «Valuing the Future - Temporal Discounting of Health and Money», Medical Decision Making, 15(4), pp. 373-386.
Chapman, G.B. (1996): «Temporal Discounting and Utility for Health and Money», Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 22(3), pp.771-791.
Fisher, Irving (1930): The Theory of Interest, New York: Macmillan Company.
Frederick, S. et. al. (2002): «Time Discounting and Time Preference: A critical review», Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), pp. 351-401.
Garrison, R.W. (2001): Time and Money, The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure, Routledge.
Green, L. et al. (1994): «Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes», Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1(3), pp. 383-89.
Hayek, F.A. von (1967) [1931]: Prices and Production, 2.ª ed., Nueva York, Kelley. Traducida al español por Carlos Rodríguez Braun, Unión Editorial, Madrid, 1996.
——
(1945): «The Use of Knowledge in Society», American Economic Review, XXXV, n.º 4, septiembre de 1945, pp. 519-530. Traducida al español para «El uso del conocimiento en la sociedad», Revista Estudios Públicos n.º 12, Centro de Estudios Públicos, Chile, 1983
——
(1952): The counter-revolution of science: studies on the abuse of reason, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
Jevons, W.S. (1965) [1871]: The Theory of Political Economy. 5.ª ed., Reprints of Economic Classics, Kelley, New York.
Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. (1979): «Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk», Econometrica, Princeton, n.º 47, pp. 263-291.
Kirby, K.N. (1997): «Bidding on the Future: Evidence Against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards», Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 126(1), pp. 54-70.
Kirby, K.N.; Herrnstein, R.J. (1995): «Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward», Psychological Science, 6(2), pp. 83-89.
Laibson, D. (1997): «Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting», Quarterly Journal of Economics, Cambridge, n.º 112, pp. 443-477.
Laibson, D. et al. (1998): «Self-control and saving for retirement», Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 91-196.Loewe, G. (2006): «The development of a theory of rational intertemporal choice», Revista de Sociologia, n.º 80, pp. 195-221.
Loewenstein, G.; Prelec, D. (1992): «Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice – Evidence and an Interpretation», Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), pp. 573-597.
Mazur, J.E. (1984): «Tests of an Equivalence Rule for Fixed and Variable Delays», Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, pp. 426-436.
Mises, L. von (1986) [1949]: La Acción Humana: Tratado de Economía, cuarta edición, Unión Editorial, Madrid.— (2007) [1957]: Theory and History. An interoretation of social and economic evolution. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama.
O’Donoghue, T.; Rabin, M. (1999): «Procrastination in Preparing for Retirement», In: Aaron, H., Ed., Behavioral Dimensions of Retirement Economics, Brookings Institution Press and Russell Sage Foundation, Washington DC, pp. 125-160.
Pender, J.L. (1996): «Discount Rates and Credit Markets: Theory and Evidence From Rural India», Journal of Development Economics, 50, pp. 257-296.
Rae, J. (1905) [1834]: The Sociological Theory of Capital. London: McMillan.
Ravier, A. (2009): Em Busca del Pleno Empleo. Unión Editorial, Madrid.Read, D. (2001): «Is Time-Discounting Hyperbolic or Subadditive?», Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23(1), pp. 5-32.
Redelmeier, D.A.; Heller, D.N. (1993): «Time Preferences in Medical Decision Making and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis», Medical Decision Making, 13, pp. 212-217.
Rizzo, M. (2012): «Austrian Economics Meets Behavioral Economics: The Problem of Rationality», New York University.
Rizzo, M.; Whitman, D.G. (2009): «The Knowledge Problem of New Paternalism», BYU Law Review, vol.9, issue 4, article 4.
Rothbard, M. N (2004) [1962]: Hombre, Economía y Estado: Tratado de Principios de Economía & Poder y Mercado: el Gobierno y la Economía, segunda edición, Scholar’s Edition, Ludwig von Mises Institute Auburn, Alabama.
Rubinstein, A. (2003): «Economics and Psychology? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting», International Economic Review, vol. 44, pp. 1207-1216.
Samuelson, P. A. (1937): «A Note on Measurement of Utility», The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 4, issue 2, pp. 155-161.
Strotz, R. H. (1955-1956): «Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility Maximization», Review of Economic Studies, 23(3), pp. 165-80.
Thaler, R. H. (1981): «Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency», Economic Letters, 8, pp. 201-07.
——
(1980): «Toward a positive theory of consumer choice», Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 39-60.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-06-08 (3)
- 2022-06-08 (2)
- 2022-03-09 (1)
